The Web Bot Project and Its Prophesies

The Web Bot Venture is a application system that was designed by Clif Great and Henry Ure in the Nineties.

Clif Great initially started creating application in an make an effort to stand above motions in the marketplaces. But Web Bot has obtained popularity for something else-- an claimed capability to anticipate upcoming events!

How is this possible? Clif Great statements that the application functions depending on the intuitive capabilities in every human being. As the system scours the world wide web, it choices up on certain terms and notices the changes in their circumstances.

By doing this, details can apparently be collected that may notify us about things that are going to happen later on.

This details can often be unexplained but is sometimes strangely particular.

Unsurprisingly, Clif Great and Henry Ure have a lot of experts. Considering that the entire Web Bot Venture is in the supposition that all people have predictive intuitive abilities-- well, that's hardly surprising.

However, they also have a truly passionate following as well! From YouTube video clips to stations programming to updates and running a blog, Clif Great, Henry Ure and the Web Bot Venture are regularly distributing information about their designs and forecasts that is easily locatable.

They declare to have had past knowledge of many activities in the past, at the same time somewhat unexplained. Providing amazingly particular alerts and announcements about a upcoming event has never been its concentrate. So while the proof seems to show some credibility to the Venture and the details it provides, that details isn't actually the most beneficial in offering guidelines or advice to prevent unwanted circumstances.

But what have they expected for 2012?

Could the Web Bot Venture have the capability to forewarn us about the potential risks of a 2012 Apocalypse?

Well so far, the details has been restricted. Basically.

As described previously, the system works by looking the world wide web looking for changes in the use terminology. This details is collected and then examined.

But here's the issue with details around Dec 21, 2012: there isn't much details.

For some unidentified reason, there seems to be a huge gap of details available in the immediate months following Dec 2012. The number of details then surprisingly continues mid-way through 2013.

Why should that be? It is a secret to be sure, but may also be an idea in-and-of itself.